Why Ship Financing Fails—and How You Can Avoid It

My name is Davide Ramponi, I am 20 years old and currently training as a shipping agent in Hamburg. In my blog, I take you with me on my journey into the exciting world of shipping. I share my knowledge, my experiences, and my progress on the way to becoming an expert in the field of Sale and Purchase – the trade with ships.

Financing is the lifeblood of shipbuilding and fleet renewal. But despite the vast sums of money involved and the high stakes for owners and banks alike, ship financing deals often fall apart—sometimes before they even begin.

Why is that?

From overly optimistic projections to shifting market conditions and poor stakeholder coordination, there are many ways a promising project can hit a wall. And when financing collapses, the consequences can be severe: delayed deliveries, legal disputes, strained partnerships—and in the worst cases, cancelled orders or insolvency.

In this article, I want to take a closer look at why ship financing fails, drawing from real-life scenarios and practical experience. More importantly, I’ll share tips and strategies to help shipowners, brokers and financiers avoid these common pitfalls and keep their projects on track.

Unrealistic Business Plans: Overpromising, Underdelivering

Let’s start with one of the most frequent causes of failed financing: plans that look good on paper but fall apart under scrutiny.

Common mistakes:

• Overestimating charter rates or future earnings

• Ignoring maintenance, retrofitting or downtime costs

• Assuming full employment of the vessel without backup plans

• Relying on single-charterer deals that aren’t yet confirmed

These errors often stem from a lack of experience—or pressure to make a deal look more attractive to lenders.

Real-life example:

A small shipping company approached a regional bank to finance a second-hand Aframax tanker. The business case relied on a time charter contract that had only been verbally agreed—with no signed LOI or rate guarantee. When the bank asked for documentation, the charterer backed out. The deal collapsed, and the shipowner lost the vessel to a competing buyer.

💡 Tip:

Before talking to banks, validate your numbers. Use conservative estimates for revenue and costs. Have backup charter options, and never rely on verbal agreements when seeking financing.

Market Volatility: When Timing Turns Against You

Shipping is a cyclical industry. A project that looks great today might be underwater tomorrow. One of the biggest risks to financing is changing market dynamics during the loan application or construction period.

What can go wrong:

• Freight rates drop suddenly, affecting projected cash flow

• Steel or engine prices spike, increasing capex

• Interest rates rise, making loans more expensive

• New IMO regulations shift demand to other vessel types

Even the most detailed plan can be derailed by macroeconomic changes.

Real-life example:

During the COVID-19 recovery, a dry bulk operator placed an order for a new Ultramax, assuming the strong 2021–22 rate environment would continue. By mid-2023, spot rates had fallen by 40%, and the owner could no longer secure a charter rate high enough to justify loan repayment terms. The financing fell apart, and the yard reassigned the build slot.

💡 Tip:

Factor in worst-case scenarios in your financial model. Consider how your loan can withstand rate drops, price hikes, or delays. A strong risk buffer makes your case more attractive to banks.

Poor Communication: Misalignment Between Stakeholders

Ship financing is a team sport. You’ve got shipowners, banks, brokers, legal teams, technical consultants, classification societies—and the shipyard. Miscommunication or lack of coordination between these parties is a major reason why deals fail.

Common issues:

• Incomplete or inconsistent documentation

• Delays in technical specs or shipyard responses

• Misunderstood risk allocations in the contract

• Language or cultural barriers in international projects

A lack of clarity leads to delays, distrust, and missed deadlines—which can ultimately scare off lenders.

Real-life example:

In one S&P deal I observed, a promising financing arrangement broke down because the shipyard was late providing a confirmed delivery date. The bank needed this info to structure the loan drawdowns. Without it, the financing approval couldn’t proceed, and the window to lock in the interest rate passed.

💡 Tip:

Appoint a project coordinator or broker who acts as the central point of contact. Ensure all parties have access to real-time updates and that communication lines are clearly defined from day one.

Lack of Transparency: Missing or Inaccurate Information

Banks don’t like surprises. If something important is hidden, omitted, or unclear—chances are the financing will be rejected or stalled.

Red flags for banks:

• Missing ownership history or unclear vessel registry

• Incomplete maintenance logs or outdated certificates

• Inconsistencies between ship specs and documents

• Hidden liens, debts, or unclear equity contributions

If lenders sense something is being concealed, even unintentionally, it erodes trust.

Real-life example:

A shipowner applied for refinancing of a second-hand LPG carrier. During due diligence, the bank discovered the vessel had been involved in a collision three years earlier—information that had been left out of the documentation. Even though the ship had been repaired, the lack of disclosure killed the deal.

💡 Tip:

Be upfront. Share all relevant information—good and bad. A deal might still go through with added risk premiums, but only if the bank is kept in the loop.

Inflexible Loan Terms: Too Rigid for a Fluid Industry

Not all failed financing is the fault of the borrower. Sometimes banks or financiers offer terms that are too restrictive for the realities of modern shipping.

Examples of rigid terms:

• No grace periods for delivery delays

• No flexibility in interest rate adjustment

• Strict repayment schedules with no market-linked clauses

• Heavy penalties for minor covenant breaches

Such rigidity can make the financing unworkable, especially for green ships or customised newbuilds, where delivery timelines and costs are inherently less predictable.

💡 Tip for Banks:

Structure loans with flexible milestones and market-linked conditions. Build in grace periods and covenant headroom to support long-term success—not just protect short-term risk.

How to Avoid the Most Common Financing Pitfalls

Let’s wrap it up with a checklist of proven strategies to reduce the risk of financing failure:

✅ For Shipowners:

• Prepare a realistic, conservative business plan

• Secure signed charter agreements or strong letters of intent

• Work with experienced brokers and legal advisors

• Maintain transparency—share full documentation

✅ For Brokers:

• Act as project coordinators, not just intermediaries

• Help clients present solid, data-driven financial cases

• Liaise actively with shipyards and technical consultants

• Flag any red flags before the bank does

✅ For Banks:

• Understand the cyclical nature of shipping

• Be open to flexible, milestone-based loan structures

• Collaborate with third-party experts to validate technical risks

• Invest in internal maritime finance expertise to improve deal evaluation

Conclusion: Ship Financing Fails—But It Doesn’t Have To

Financing a ship is never simple. The stakes are high, the risks are real, and the variables are many. But the truth is: most failed ship financing cases could have been avoided with better planning, communication, and transparency.

✅ Unrealistic assumptions? They can be corrected with a sober business case.

✅ Market risks? They can be managed with contingency planning.

✅ Communication gaps? They can be bridged with clear coordination.

✅ Rigid structures? They can be rethought for a dynamic industry.

Have you seen a ship financing project fall through—or barely survive? What lessons did you learn? Share your stories and tips in the comments—I look forward to the exchange!

---

---