📊 Shipbuilding by the Numbers: Mastering Financial Modelling for Newbuild Investments
- Davide Ramponi

- 13. Nov.
- 5 Min. Lesezeit
My name is Davide Ramponi, I’m 21 years old and currently training as a shipping agent in Hamburg. On my blog, I take you with me on my journey into the exciting world of shipping. I share my knowledge, my experiences, and my progress on the way to becoming an expert in the field of Sale and Purchase – the trade with ships.

Ordering a new Vessel is one of the boldest moves a shipowner can make. It's a long-term bet on the future — of freight rates, fuel technology, regulation, and financing. But beneath the big decisions lies something equally important: a solid, well-built financial model.
Financial modelling is where strategy meets structure. It helps owners answer the key questions:
Will this vessel make money — and how much?
What assumptions are driving our projections?
How sensitive is our return to fuel costs, hire rates, or capex overruns?
Can we convince a bank — or an investor — to back the project?
In this post, we break down the essential elements of robust modelling for newbuild investments — from formulas and forecasts to tools and templates.
🔍 In this post, I’ll walk you through:
📦 What makes a financial model “fit for purpose” in shipbuilding decisions
📈 How to run sensitivities on charter rates, fuel prices, and capex
🔍 The differences between IRR, DCF, and payback period — and when to use each
🏦 How financial models support loan approvals and investor trust
💻 The best tools and software for shipping-specific modelling
Let’s fire up Excel and plot a smart course through the economics of fleet growth.
⚙️ The Core Components of a Strong Financial Model
A good financial model does more than crunch numbers — it tells a story. It links commercial logic, technical details, and financing strategy in a transparent, testable way.
🔑 Key Building Blocks:
Capex & Financing Structure
Newbuild price (incl. design upgrades, owner’s supply, supervision)
Equity/debt split
Loan terms: tenor, interest rate, repayment profile (e.g., bullet or annuity)
Operating Assumptions
OPEX breakdown (crew, insurance, maintenance, provisions)
Drydocking cycles and costs
Daily management fee or overhead
Revenue Forecasts
TCE rates (spot vs. time charter, realistic vs. optimistic scenario)
Idle time assumptions
Charterer quality and counterparty risk
Fuel Consumption & Costs
Engine spec and fuel type (VLSFO, LNG, methanol, etc.)
Consumption by speed and load
Carbon tax estimates (IMO 2027, ETS coverage)
Residual Value / Scrap
Expected life of vessel (typically 20–25 years)
Conservative scrap pricing or resale value
Returns & Metrics
Cash flows (by month or year)
IRR, NPV, payback period
Debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) for lenders
💡 Tip:
Always include a “scenario sheet” — showing best case, base case, and worst case outcomes.
🧪 Sensitivity Analysis: Stress-Testing the Business Case
Even a perfect model is only as good as its inputs. Markets change — and so do costs. That’s why sensitivity analysis is a non-negotiable part of financial modelling.
📊 Variables You Must Stress-Test:
Charter Rates
+/- 20% shift in TCE can swing IRR from +15% to negative
Build 3–5 rate scenarios: bearish, neutral, bullish, and recovery lag
Fuel Costs
Model bunker price volatility (especially if dual-fuel)
Explore “carbon cost” inclusion for emissions-intensive fuels
Capex Overruns
Shipyard delays or spec upgrades can inflate cost by 10–20%
Model delivery date slippage and interest during construction (IDC)
Operating Costs Inflation
Wages, spare parts, insurance premiums — especially post-COVID
Model 3–4% annual OPEX inflation
Residual Value Drop
Discount future scrap or resale values by 25–30% to stay conservative
Can shift payback periods by multiple years
📌 Use a tornado chart to visualize which inputs impact IRR and NPV the most — a great tool for investor presentations.
📉 IRR, DCF, Payback: Measuring Returns the Right Way
Once your model is built, it's time to evaluate the economics.
🔁 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Measures the discount rate at which NPV = 0
Common threshold for investment: 12–15% IRR, depending on risk
Pros: Intuitive and widely accepted
Cons: Can be distorted by timing of large cash flows (e.g., resale in year 20)
💰 Net Present Value (NPV)
Shows the absolute dollar value created over cost of capital
Positive NPV = wealth-generating investment
Better for comparing projects of different sizes or durations
⏳ Payback Period
How long it takes to recover initial investment
Important for liquidity-sensitive owners or short-cycle fleets
Doesn’t capture long-term upside — but shows risk buffer
📌 Best practice:
Include all three metrics in your summary sheet. Each appeals to different decision-makers (e.g., CFO, investor, lender).
🏦 Using Financial Models in Loan and Investor Discussions
Shipbuilding isn’t cheap. Getting funding means presenting a clear case — and your model is the cornerstone of that case.
For Banks:
Show DSCR above minimum threshold (typically >1.2x)
Demonstrate conservative charter assumptions
Highlight vessel efficiency vs. peers
Include downside scenario with stress-tested serviceability
For Investors:
Emphasize equity IRR and long-term upside
Include exit strategies (e.g., resale, refinancing)
Align with green finance standards if applicable
Be transparent about risk factors — it builds credibility
💡 Pro tip:
Accompany your model with a 1-page Executive Summary — clear, visual, and jargon-free.
💻 Tools and Software to Build Better Models
Financial modelling for newbuilds doesn’t require fancy tools — but the right platform improves accuracy and presentation.
🔧 Recommended Tools:
Excel (with shipping-specific templates)
Still the industry standard
Use macros for scenario switches and charting
Argus or Veson IMOS
Commercially focused tools for voyage economics, linked to financial plans
Orbital Ship Finance Model
Shipping-focused SaaS platform for deal structuring and investor presentations
Custom-built templates
Many S&P brokers or consultants offer white-label models for their clients
📌 Reminder:
Clean formatting, version control, and clear inputs vs. outputs are just as important as the numbers themselves.
📦 Conclusion: Build the Model — Build the Confidence
A strong financial model is more than a spreadsheet — it’s a strategic asset. It turns market instincts and technical specs into a quantifiable investment case. It prepares you for tough questions, sharpens your assumptions, and secures funding when the time comes.
Key Takeaways 🎯
✅ A solid model integrates capex, opex, chartering, and financing into a clear cash flow forecast
📊 Sensitivity analysis on TCE, fuel, and capex is crucial — not optional
📉 IRR, NPV, and payback all provide different angles on project value
🏦 Strong modelling helps convince banks, investors, and internal boards
💻 Excel remains king — but specialized platforms are gaining ground
Before you order your next vessel, make sure the math supports the mission.
👇 What do you thing?
Do you model for upside — or stress-test for downside first?
💬 Share your thoughts in the comments — I look forward to the exchange!





Kommentare