🚨 Port State Control: What Regional Trends Mean for Your Fleet

My name is Davide Ramponi, I’m 21 years old and currently training as a shipping agent in Hamburg. On my blog, I take you with me on my journey into the exciting world of shipping. I share my knowledge, my experiences, and my progress on the way to becoming an expert in the field of Sale and Purchase – the trade with ships.

Port State Control (PSC) inspections are one of the most decisive factors influencing a ship’s ability to operate smoothly—or not. While the basics of PSC are governed by IMO conventions like SOLAS, MARPOL, and MLC, the real inspection experience varies significantly by region. Different Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs), from Paris to Tokyo, bring different inspection cultures, deficiency trends, and watch lists that operators must understand to stay compliant.

In this article, we explore how PSC regimes differ across regions, what current inspection trends are telling us, and how shipowners can reduce risk by taking a region-specific approach to compliance management.

🔍 In this post, I’ll walk you through:

✅ How PSC inspection frameworks differ between global MoUs

✅ Deficiency and detention trends you need to know

✅ Regional “risk zones” and fleet benchmarking strategies

✅ PSC watch lists and warning categories

✅ Practical strategies to reduce inspection risk and improve scores

🧭 A Global Network with Regional Behavior: What Is PSC?

Port State Control is a system that allows maritime authorities in a given country (the port state) to inspect foreign-flagged vessels calling at its ports. The goal is to enforce international regulations—even if the flag state fails to do so.

🔗 PSC inspections are coordinated through nine regional MoUs:

• Paris MoU (Europe & North Atlantic)

• Tokyo MoU (Asia-Pacific)

• USCG (United States)

• Black Sea, Caribbean, Mediterranean, Indian Ocean, Abuja, and Riyadh MoUs

Each MoU:

• Has its own inspection database, risk model, and targeting matrix

• Publishes annual reports on detentions and deficiencies

• Maintains “black,” “grey,” and “white” lists of flag state performance

📢 Bottom line: 

A PSC inspection in Rotterdam is not the same as one in Manila.

🔍 What the Data Says: Global Trends in PSC Inspections

Despite regional differences, there are clear global themes emerging in recent PSC reports:

📈 Trend 1: Technical Deficiencies Are Rising

The most frequent technical issues across all MoUs:

• Fire safety systems

• Emergency generators

• Lifeboat launching gear

• Navigational equipment (ECDIS, AIS, radar)

📉 These aren’t just paperwork errors—they reflect equipment neglect and insufficient testing routines.

📈 Trend 2: MLC-Related Deficiencies Climb

Particularly in crew rest, repatriation, and medical care access, MLC issues are increasingly flagged—especially post-pandemic.

⚠️ Ships without updated Seafarer Employment Agreements or medical plans have faced immediate detentions in Canada, Australia, and several EU ports.

📈 Trend 3: Newbuilds and Older Vessels Are Both At Risk

• Newbuilds: Often get detained for crew unfamiliarity with new systems

• Older ships: More vulnerable to corrosion, structural cracks, and outdated firefighting equipment

🧩 PSC regimes are no longer lenient with age—every vessel is subject to scrutiny.

🌍 Regional Focus: What Sets Each MoU Apart?

🇪🇺 Paris MoU

• Covers 27 maritime authorities including EU and UK

• Known for deep, multi-hour inspections

• Focus Areas: SOLAS fire safety, MARPOL compliance, crew contracts

🔴 Annual “Concentrated Inspection Campaigns” (CICs) are published and strictly followed.

🇯🇵 Tokyo MoU

• Covers Asia-Pacific including Japan, China, Australia

• Targets ships based on a Company Performance matrix

• Focus Areas: ISM implementation, MLC, navigational safety

📈 High rates of detentions in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Papua New Guinea.

🇺🇸 USCG (United States)

• Not part of a MoU but operates a standalone enforcement regime

• Has a Qualship 21 list for top performers

• Focus Areas: Firefighting equipment, oily water separator, ballast water systems

🧾 PSC inspections here are heavily documentation-focused, with zero tolerance for MARPOL issues.

🏴 Other Regions

• Black Sea & Indian Ocean MoUs: Rising in influence due to port upgrades and trade volume

• Abuja & Riyadh MoUs: Often suffer from inconsistency and under-reporting

• Caribbean MoU: Strong focus on passenger ship safety and weather preparedness

📍 For ships on tramp trade or global rotation, understanding these regional behaviors is critical.

📊 Benchmarking Performance: How Does Your Fleet Compare?

PSC MoUs maintain public databases of inspection outcomes. By analyzing your fleet’s performance versus the regional average, you can:

• Identify risk vessels

• Track inspection intervals

• Detect systemic weaknesses (e.g. certain vessels always failing firefighting drills)

📣 Tip: 

Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU both provide flag state rankings and company performance metrics—use them to benchmark and prepare.

⚠️ Regional Watch Lists and Warning Flags

Each MoU publishes lists of “underperforming ships” or “high-risk companies.” If your company appears on one, expect:

• More frequent inspections

• Lower inspection priority at congested ports

• Fewer vetting approvals and charter opportunities

🚩 Watch List Triggers May Include:

• 2+ detentions in 24 months

• Repeated deficiencies in same category (e.g. lifeboat, MARPOL)

• Low company performance index

⛔ Appearing on a blacklist can severely damage commercial credibility.

Risk Reduction Strategies for PSC Success

Being prepared for PSC isn’t about luck—it’s about strategy. Here’s how top-performing fleets do it:

✅ 1. Port-Specific Pre-Arrival Checks

Implement a checklist tailored to regional PSC focus points (e.g. ECDIS in Tokyo MoU, fire drills in Paris MoU)

✅ 2. Drill Routines That Simulate Inspections

Train crew to perform drills under observation, with logbook accuracy and clear command hierarchy.

✅ 3. Shore-to-Ship Data Coordination

Use fleet management software to track recurring deficiencies, monitor flag state standing, and push updates to vessel staff in advance.

✅ 4. Onboard Compliance Champions

Designate a compliance officer or inspection lead on each vessel who prepares the team ahead of each port call.

🧩 Case Study: Turning a PSC Weakness Into a Strength

Company: 

Mid-size bulker fleet with prior PSC issues in North Europe

Problem: 

3 detentions in Paris MoU within 12 months

Solution:

• Hired ex-PSC inspectors as consultants

• Created region-specific inspection prep protocols

• Digitized logbook and training records

Result:

• Moved from Paris MoU “grey list” to white in 18 months

• Reduced average PSC deficiencies from 6.2 to 1.4 per inspection

• Secured long-term charter contracts thanks to improved audit history

🔍 Final Thoughts: The Power of Regional PSC Intelligence

While Port State Control is global in intent, it’s regional in application. A one-size-fits-all compliance approach no longer works. By understanding the behavior of different MoUs and using data to tailor your inspection preparation, you not only avoid detentions—you improve commercial positioning and operational reputation.

Key Takeaways 🎯

✔️ PSC regimes vary widely by region—know your port

✔️ Technical and MLC deficiencies dominate current trends

✔️ Regional watch lists can heavily impact your fleet’s inspection profile

✔️ Benchmarking and digital tracking help you stay one step ahead

✔️ Proactive, region-specific prep is the new gold standard in compliance

👇 How does your company prepare for PSC inspections across different MoUs?

Have you noticed trends in certain ports or surprise deficiency categories?

💬 Share your thoughts in the comments — I look forward to the exchange!

---

---