⚓ IMO III Code Explained: What Shipowners Must Know to Stay Compliant

My name is Davide Ramponi, I’m 21 years old and currently training as a shipping agent in Hamburg. On my blog, I take you with me on my journey into the exciting world of shipping. I share my knowledge, my experiences, and my progress on the way to becoming an expert in the field of Sale and Purchase – the trade with ships.

With regulations constantly evolving and scrutiny intensifying from all directions—flag states, port state control, classification societies—it’s easy for shipowners to feel caught in a web of compliance. Enter the IMO Instruments Implementation Code (III Code): a critical framework that links together all the moving parts of international maritime compliance.

While it may not sound as flashy as CII or as urgent as DCS deadlines, the III Code underpins how maritime conventions are applied—and enforced. Knowing how it works (and where your responsibilities lie) can be the difference between smooth sailing and a serious detour into regulatory trouble.

🔍 In this post, I’ll walk you through:

• 📘 What the IMO III Code is and why it matters

• 🇺🇳 How it reshapes flag state responsibilities

• 🚢 What it means for class societies and port state control (PSC)

• 📋 What practical steps shipowners must take

• 🧰 Tools and resources to support implementation

📘 What Is the IMO III Code and Why Should You Care?

The IMO Instruments Implementation Code—commonly known as the III Code—entered into force in 2016. It’s officially known as IMO Resolution A.1070(28) and is mandatory under SOLAS, MARPOL, STCW, and other major IMO conventions.

But what does it actually do?

🧾 Purpose of the III Code:

• To ensure uniform implementation and enforcement of IMO instruments

• To create a framework for audit of flag, coastal, and port state obligations

• To establish standardized oversight mechanisms and responsibilities

• To improve transparency and accountability across maritime administrations

In simpler terms: the III Code makes sure that all IMO member states do what they say they’re doing when it comes to enforcing maritime rules.

⚖️ It’s about turning theory into enforceable, trackable practice.

🇺🇳 How the III Code Impacts Flag States

Flag states are at the heart of the III Code. After all, they’re the ones issuing the certificates, approving the safety plans, and overseeing the vessels flying their flag.

🛂 Key responsibilities for flag states under the III Code:

• Conduct audits of their own maritime authorities

• Maintain proper documentation and reporting systems

• Ensure compliance with IMO regulations across their fleet

• Supervise class societies and recognized organizations (ROs)

• Investigate accidents and report non-compliance transparently

📌 The III Code essentially puts flag states on the hook for enforcement consistency. If one flag is lax while another is strict, the IMO now has the framework to challenge that imbalance through audits and follow-up actions.

🧠 For shipowners:

It means choosing a flag state is also choosing a compliance reputation. Flags that fail their audits may face more inspections, less trust from PSC, and even higher insurance premiums.

🚢 PSC and Class: How the III Code Connects the Dots

If flag states are the center of the compliance system, port state control (PSC) and classification societies are its arms and legs.

The III Code outlines how every link in the compliance chain must align—from issuing certificates to inspecting life-saving equipment, to updating crew training requirements.

🔗 What this means in practice:

• Class societies must operate in line with flag policies—and are now being watched more closely by both flag states and the IMO

• PSC inspections increasingly reference flag performance under the III Code

• Documentation inconsistencies (e.g., between DPA records and flag filings) are major red flags

🎯 The Code promotes a culture of continuous verification, not one-time paperwork.

📋 What Shipowners Must Do in Practice

While the III Code targets governments and administrations, its impact lands directly on shipowners. Your daily operations, your choice of flag and class, and your ability to document compliance are all part of this ecosystem.

✅ Owner obligations linked to the III Code:

• Ensure all certificates (ISPS, ISM, MLC, etc.) are valid and accurately maintained

• Work only with class societies recognized by your flag under IMO rules

• Participate in audits or flag reviews when required

• Report non-conformities proactively and transparently

• Monitor your flag state’s IMO audit status

🛠 Operational steps to stay aligned:

• Integrate flag audit prep into your internal safety management system (SMS)

• Maintain version control on compliance documents

• Store digital logs that match PSC/flag audit requirements

• Use software platforms that support multi-flag compliance alignment

💬 Your job isn’t just to follow the rules—it’s to prove you’re doing so consistently.

🧰 Support Tools for Implementation

Thankfully, shipowners aren’t left to figure this out alone. Several platforms, societies, and initiatives help navigate III Code-related compliance more effectively.

📡 Recommended tools and solutions:

• DNV Navigator or NAPA Compliance Manager: Track audit readiness, flag documentation, and compliance gaps

• IACS Class Reporting Tools: Streamline interface between class societies and flag states

• EMSA's THETIS platform: View PSC performance data and track inspection risks

• IMO’s GISIS database: Access global compliance reports and flag audit results

• Flag state bulletins: Regular updates on implementation protocols and audits

🧠 Tip:

Subscribe to your flag state's circulars and bulletins—they often contain III Code-specific instructions or deadlines.

🧭 III Code in Action: Case Examples

Here are a few real-world scenarios where the III Code has made a clear difference.

📌 Case 1: Flag Audit Highlights Gaps in Crew Certification

What happened:

A European flag state was audited under the III Code. The IMO found inconsistent enforcement of STCW training renewals.

Result:

Flag authority mandated immediate updates for all flagged vessels. Several owners had to rush to retrain or recertify crew—at high cost and with charter delays.

🎯 Lesson:

Even if you’re compliant, your flag’s weaknesses can affect you.

📌 Case 2: PSC Targeting Linked to Flag’s III Score

What happened:

A PSC authority increased inspections for vessels under a particular flag that had failed an IMO audit.

Result:

Vessels under that flag saw more detentions and a 15% increase in inspection frequency.

🎯 Lesson:

Your flag’s performance isn’t just political—it’s operational risk.

📦 Conclusion: It’s Not Optional—It’s Foundational

The IMO III Code isn’t just another line in a long list of maritime regulations. It’s the foundation upon which maritime compliance is built and enforced. For shipowners, that means aligning not only with direct operational rules—but also with how those rules are interpreted, audited, and applied across authorities.

When your vessel is aligned with a strong flag, a solid class society, and a proactive internal system, the III Code becomes an advantage—not a burden.

Key Takeaways 🎯

• 📘 The III Code governs how IMO rules are implemented and enforced

• 🇺🇳 Flag states are directly accountable for compliance consistency

• 🚢 Class and PSC inspections now operate with III oversight in mind

• 📋 Shipowners must document and prove compliance at every level

• 🧰 Support tools make alignment achievable—and audit-proof

👇 How has your experience been with flag audits or compliance enforcement tied to the III Code?

Are you confident in your documentation trail?

💬 Share your thoughts in the comments — I look forward to the exchange!

---

---