♻️ Built to Retire: Why Decommissioning Planning Starts at Newbuild Design

My name is Davide Ramponi, I’m 20 years old and currently training as a shipping agent in Hamburg. On my blog, I take you with me on my journey into the exciting world of shipping. I share my knowledge, my experiences, and my progress on the way to becoming an expert in the field of Sale and Purchase – the trade with ships.

When we talk about newbuilds, most conversations focus on performance, compliance, and fuel choice. But there’s another question that’s becoming just as important:What happens when the ship reaches the end of its life?

Decommissioning used to be an afterthought—a distant concern for someone else, decades later. But with the rise of environmental regulation, ESG reporting, and responsible recycling, planning for end-of-life is now part of smart ship design.

In this post, I’ll walk you through:

• 🧩 How to plan dismantling and recycling from the design phase

• 🧱 Why material selection matters for recyclability and compliance

• 📜 How the Hong Kong Convention impacts design and documentation

• 📲 The role of digital systems in lifecycle tracking

• ⚖️ Shipowner responsibilities and liabilities at end-of-life

Whether you’re a naval architect, technical manager, or future-focused owner, thinking ahead now will save cost, risk, and reputation later.

🧩 Designing With the End in Mind: Why It Matters

Traditionally, decommissioning was seen as a scrapyard problem. But that mindset is quickly fading.

Why plan for dismantling now?

• 🌍 Environmental pressure: Stakeholders demand low-impact recycling

• 📜 Regulatory compliance: Hong Kong Convention and EU SRR apply

• 💸 Cost certainty: Knowing what’s recyclable reduces future cost risk

• 🧾 ESG reporting: Lifecycle impact includes end-of-life phase

• 🛡️ Liability control: Poor dismantling practices can lead to legal and financial damage—even if decades away

🛠 Design Analogy:

A ship is like a building—you wouldn’t build a skyscraper without planning how it can eventually be torn down. The same principle applies at sea.

🎯 Takeaway:

Sustainable shipping starts with sustainable ship endings—planned from day one.

🧱 Choosing Materials for Safe and Smart Recycling

When the time comes to recycle a ship, every material choice made at the newbuild stage will affect the process. From coatings to composites, smart material selection simplifies dismantling—and boosts recyclability.

🔧 Key Material Considerations:

• Steel: Choose recyclable grades and avoid coatings with heavy metals

• Composites: Difficult to recycle—limit where possible or plan for modular removal

• Cabling and electronics: Minimise hazardous insulation, design for disassembly

• Paints and coatings: Use non-toxic antifouling and avoid asbestos or PCBs

• Machinery and piping: Design for access and safe removal

♻️ Best Practices:

• Prefer homogeneous and non-toxic materials

• Avoid bonded joints where bolted solutions can work

• Design with clear component boundaries (separate decks, bulkhead systems, etc.)

• Use eco-labelling and supplier declarations to verify recyclability

✅ Example:

Some shipyards are now using eco-friendly hull coatings and marked, modular engine installations designed to be easily removed and recycled—reducing dismantling time and contamination risk.

🎯 Takeaway:

Material choice = legacy. It defines how cleanly—and legally—your ship can be taken apart in 30 years.

📜 The Hong Kong Convention: Compliance That Starts at the Keel

The Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships (HKC) was adopted by IMO in 2009, and is now moving toward global enforcement.

But its requirements begin not at scrapping—but at construction.

⚖️ Key HKC Requirements Relevant to Newbuilds:

• 🔍 Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM): Must be developed, maintained, and updated from build to scrap

• 📋 Material Declarations: Shipyards and suppliers must declare chemical content of components

• 🏗️ Design for Disassembly: Encouraged by class societies through notations and IHM audits

• 📅 Ongoing documentation: IHM must be updated during drydocks, retrofits, and major repairs

🌍 Global Scope:

• Ratified by countries representing more than 30% of the world fleet

• Aligns closely with EU Ship Recycling Regulation (EU SRR)—already enforced for EU-flagged ships

• Class societies like DNV, ABS, and BV now provide HKC compliance pathways at the newbuild stage

🧾 Class Example:

DNV’s “Smart IHM” service integrates material declarations directly into ship design software, allowing for real-time compliance tracking across the lifecycle.

🎯 Takeaway:

HKC isn’t about the yard—it’s about the owner. And that responsibility starts with the contract and the CAD file.

📲 Lifecycle Tracking Through Digital Systems

A ship’s design might be physical—but its lifecycle tracking is increasingly digital. Digital systems now allow for component-level visibility, helping you track and manage everything from propeller material to PCB content.

📦 What to Track Digitally:

• Structural components and material specs

• Hazardous materials by zone or system

• Equipment serial numbers and recycling declarations

• Coating systems and insulation data

• Updates and modifications across the vessel’s life

📊 Tools That Support Smart Tracking:

Platform	Function
DNV Veracity	Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM) management
NAPA Fleet	Lifecycle monitoring, sustainability reporting
CADMATIC eShare	3D model-based material and component tracking
Class Notations (e.g., IHM Ready)	Structured documentation and auditability

✅ Best Practice:

Digital twins can now include a “scrap scenario”—modelling environmental and financial impact at end-of-life, based on real component data.

🎯 Takeaway:

If you can’t track it, you can’t recycle it—digital tools are essential to closing the loop.

⚖️ Shipowner Liabilities and Responsibilities at End-of-Life

Even if your newbuild won’t be recycled for 30 years, your company could be held responsible for how and where that vessel is dismantled.

💥 Legal and Financial Risks:

• Ships scrapped at non-compliant yards (e.g., South Asia beaching) can lead to:

  • 💰 Fines under EU SRR or HKC

  • 📰 Reputational damage with investors and public

  • 🛑 Chartering bans from ESG-conscious customers

🚢 What Shipowners Must Do:

• Specify HKC compliance in newbuild contracts and supplier agreements

• Maintain and regularly update the IHM file

• Ensure clear documentation of ownership and asset disposal

• Choose end-of-life yards from approved lists (e.g., EU-approved recycling yards)

• Consider third-party recycling brokers or compliance advisors

✅ Real-World Example:

A major tanker company faced public backlash when its retired vessel was found at a non-compliant beaching site—despite selling the ship years earlier. The backlash damaged its ESG score and prompted a full audit of its decommissioning procedures.

🎯 Takeaway:

You own the ship’s legacy—even if you don’t own it when it’s scrapped. Build that responsibility into your strategy now.

🧠 Conclusion: End-of-Life Is the New Starting Point

Newbuilds are no longer just about performance at sea—they’re about responsibility at every stage, including the very last one.

Smart owners are planning today for a retirement that’s safe, sustainable, and strategically sound—not rushed, risky, or reputationally damaging.

Key Takeaways 🎯

• Plan decommissioning and recyclability from the design phase

• Select non-toxic, modular, recyclable materials

• Integrate with Hong Kong Convention and track compliance via IHM

• Use digital platforms for full lifecycle visibility

• Own your long-term responsibility as part of a forward-looking ESG strategy

♻️ Because sustainability doesn’t stop at EEXI or carbon credits—it ends when your ship is dismantled ethically, legally, and cleanly.

👇 What do you thing?

Are you incorporating decommissioning into your newbuild specs? Have you seen good (or bad) examples of end-of-life planning?

💬 Share your thoughts in the comments — I look forward to the exchange!

---

---